Friday, December 4, 2020

Motivation studies in Construction Industry: Global Context

 



If under ordinary conditions, the employee’s motivation is an influential reason for organization of project’s attainment and attractiveness through decline periods, it is even further essential to pursue the greatest approach to inspire human assets to develop the managerial environment, exploit the routine of experts, specifically their productivity. Agreeing inspiration and holding policies may increase managerial productivity, escalate efficiency and cost-effectiveness and also please the singular desires of teams (decreasing tension and career uncertainty during enhancing reliability, engagement and work contentment) therefore, it will facilitate the competitive market (Wiley, 2008; Darrington and Howell, 2011).

Lim and Ling (2012) discuss in the research it will be vital for contractors to form a suitable operational background. And also there is a relationship among working satisfaction and performs such as appreciating members’ determinations, connecting them in creating main conclusions, assigning work capacity properly, applying a system of act assessment and adopting an adequate organizational structure (Tabassi, A. A., Ramli, M., & Bakar, 2012).  Cardoso, Dominguez and Paiva (2015) have reviewed on new theoretical tactics for escalation the motivation in construction projects.

According to Wiley (2008), the responses of the analysis were rated the best five aspects which inspire them in the works: (1) worthy salaries; (2)gratitude for effort; (3) career safety; (4) upgrade and progression; and (5) fascinating effort. These consequences disclose that factors of motivate employees revolute with time and can differ considerably through subdivisions. Furthermore, these above evaluated factors can differ accordance with employ position, profession, gender and earnings (Wiley, 2008).

Jarkas, Radosavljevic and Wuyi (2014), identified the noticeable demotivational features which are affecting to enactment and efficiency of project managers (Engineers, Architects) in the State of Qatar: (1)poor financial incentive schemes; (2)slow decision-making process by owners; (3)remuneration scale; (4)delay in responding to RFI; (5)shortage of skilled labour force; (6)shortage of materials; (7)clarity and completeness of technical specifications; (8))frequent changing orders during execution; (9)drawings quality level; and (10)rework. Moreover, due to the background of building process plus exceptionality of any project, both, workers and site administration, improve a pride, contentment, and self-esteem owing to perceiving regular progress transforming into a visible product over their individual struggles. Therefore not like other professions, wherever great career fulfillment tends to better productivity, the fulfillment of project managers and it is resulted to high productivity in project (Jarkas, Radosavljevic and Wuyi, 2014).

The Shurrab Mohammed, Abbasi and Khazaleh (2018), study evaluated the influence of six motivational dimensions such as personal collaboration, assignment, working environments, authorization, personal development, and compensation on construction project managers' motivation in Jordan. Then, the construction project managers were more interested with the payment and individual improvement in Jordan. But, in Switzerland, construction project managers were encouraged more with the duty and work attitude of his team as well (Seiler et al., 2012). The reason of this could be the culture and the environment of the society and the country ranking and the economic level of living.  According to Fey (2005),  Russian managers, possibly at a lower level of the needs hierarchy, are top interested by wages and providing of bonus. In disparity, Swedish managers, who have their needs of hierarchy, are well inspired by having a satisfying working background (Shurrab Mohammed, Abbasi and Khazaleh, 2018).

Graboviy ( 2016), evaluated the effective motivation methods by using following factors.

1.    Financial - Piece-work payment, Time payment award for innovation, fee for the lack of         absenteeism (as opposed to the payment of sickness) Tuition fees (training, retraining), Fee for         business image

2.     Non-financial - Earned time off, Flexible work schedules, Enrichment of labor, Evaluation of         effectiveness, increased discharge (training), Career advancement

The staff who are working on site for very long times seem to be intensified and considered by a tendency for deprived scheduling, resource deficiency, confusion, violent management style and emotional isolation. The administration style practiced on construction sites by developing recognition, improving  scheduling efficiency and diminishing disordered environment of a project (Smithers and Walker, 2000).

 

References

Darrington, J. W. and Howell, G. A. (2011) ‘Motivation and incentives in relational contracts’, Journal of Financial Management of Property and Construction, 16(1), pp. 42–51. doi: 10.1108/13664381111116070.

Fey, C. F. (2005) ‘Opening the black box of motivation: A cross-cultural comparison of Sweden and Russia’, International Business Review, 14(3), pp. 345–367. doi: 10.1016/j.ibusrev.2005.03.004.

Graboviy, P. (2016) ‘Methods of motivation improvement and effectiveness increase on the example of construction industry enterprises’, Procedia Engineering. Elsevier B.V., 165, pp. 1520–1528. doi: 10.1016/j.proeng.2016.11.888.

Jarkas, A. M., Radosavljevic, M. and Wuyi, L. (2014) ‘Prominent demotivational factors influencing the productivity of construction project managers in Qatar’, International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 63(8), pp. 1070–1090.

Lim, L. J. W. and Ling, F. Y. Y. (2012) ‘Human resource practices of contractors that lead to job satisfaction of professional staff’, Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 19(1), pp. 101–118. doi: 10.1108/09699981211192599.

Seiler, S. et al. (2012) ‘An integrated model of factors influencing project managers’ motivation - Findings from a Swiss Survey’, International Journal of Project Management. Elsevier Ltd, 30(1), pp. 60–72. doi: 10.1016/j.ijproman.2011.03.002.

Shurrab Mohammed, Abbasi, G. and Khazaleh, R. Al (2018) ‘Evaluating the effect of motivational dimensions on the construction project managers in Jordan’, Engineering , Construction and Architectural Management, 25(3), pp. 412–424. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/ ECAM-01-2017-0001.

Smithers, G. L. and Walker, D. H. T. (2000) ‘The effect of the workplace on motivation and demotivation of construction professionals’, Construction Management and Economics, 18(7), pp. 833–841. doi: 10.1080/014461900433113.

Wiley, C. (2008) ‘What motivates employees according to over 40 years of motivation survey’.