Wednesday, December 2, 2020

McGregor’s Hygiene Theories X and Y


References Introduction

McGregor has developed a theory of motivation on the basis assumptions connecting to human behavior. function of motivating individuals involves certain hypothesis about human nature. Theory X and theory Y are two sets of hypotheses about the nature of people (Aina, 2014).

 

                                            Figure 04: McGregor’s Hygiene Theories X and Y


                                                           Source - (Hattangadi, 2014)

Application of Alderfer's ERG Theory to Construction Industry

According to (Kim et al., 2015), Safe working conditions is the most important physiological factor in construction industry. In relatedness needs, Relationship with colleagues and relationship with managers are not the most important factors affect to the construction workers. But in some countries like Philippine, Vietnamese relatively factor is higher importance than workers from other countries. In construction industry, high probability that the employees can regress to lower level Existence needs and satisfy through only salary and other benefits. Construction workers considered timely payment is more important than amount of pay. About the growth need the work force of the construction industry not considered about that. But professionals who were work in the industry mostly considered about growth need compare to the workforce (Kim et al., 2015. As a construction organization it is very important to balanced and focused on fulfillment of these three needs. Theory X

This is based on assumptions regarding the typical employee. This assumes individuals who dislike work and avoid it where possible, individuals who lack ambition dislike responsibility and leading, Individuals who wish security (Hattangadi, 2014). Management believes employees work is based on their own self-interest. To achieve the organization objectives managements, imply the Theory X. Managers believe employees working in this style are more interesting on rewards or punishments as motivation (Sunita, 2012).

Theory Y

Managers assume employees are internally motivated, interested with their job and work to well themselves without any direct reward. Managers consider their employees as most valuable assets to the company (Anna B Parkin, Tutesigensi and Büyükalp, 2009). Theory Y managers try to promote employee’s self-esteem, confidence, happiness, achievement, respect of others, and respect by others. To create a working environment or culture, where employees can develop their creativity is the challenge to the managers (Hattangadi, 2014).

 

Application of Theory X and Y to Construction Industry

According to the Aiyetan and Olotuah (2006), In construction industry work force (labor force) basically dislike and avoid works whenever possible. Because most labors not interested about their works, So, construction organizations have to be closely supervised with site supervisors, site engineers and implies with punishment to reach their objectives (Aina, 2014). Most labors and labor team leaders are not capable of solving problems. So, site supervisors and site engineers have to direct them. Most labors have limited intelligent potential (Aiyetan and Olotuah, 2006).  

In construction industry professionals find work as natural and developed an attitude from the works based on their experience with it. Professionals who works in projects will work voluntarily toward organizational objectives to which they committed. So, no need to imply the punishments (Aiyetan and Olotuah, 2006). Professional employees who works in construction organizations have protentional to solve the disputes resolution (Aina, 2014).

Reference

Aina, O. O. (2014) ‘Application of Motivation Theories in the Construction Industry’, 16(7), pp. 1–6.

Aiyetan, A. O. and Olotuah, A. O. (2006) ‘Impact of motivation on worker’s productivity in the Nigerian construction industry’, Association of Researchers in Construction Management, ARCOM 2006 - Procs 22nd Annual ARCOM Conference, 1(September), pp. 239–248.

Anna B Parkin, Tutesigensi, A. and Büyükalp, A. I. (2009) ‘MOTIVATION AMONG CONSTRUCTION WORKERS’.

Hattangadi, V. (2014) ‘Theory X & Theory Y’, 2(4), pp. 20–21.

Sunita, M. S. (2012) ‘EMPLOYEE ’ S MOTIVATION : THEORIES AND PERSPECTIVES’, 1(2), pp. 56–64.

 

 


8 comments:

  1. According to Armstrong, there are two types of motivation as intrinsic motivation and extrinsic motivation.If employee feels that his work is important, interesting and challenging and it is provides him to act freedom is intrinsic motivation. When motivating by offering rewards such incentives, payment increments, performance recognition by awarding, or even punishment can be recognized as extrinsic motivation,, ( Armstrong, M / 2014 , 13 th edition, p 163 )

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Agreed Thusitha, Intrinsic motivation is motivation that arises from within. It comes from the personal enjoyment and educational achievement that we derive from doing that particular thing. Intrinsic motivation is motivation that arises from within. It comes from the personal enjoyment and educational achievement that we derive from doing that particular thing (Sunita, 2012).

      Delete
  2. Completely agree with you, according to Aithal & Kumar (2016), these two theories indicate the motivation approach to employees. Theory X stresses the importance of strict supervision, external rewards, and penalties. Theory Y highlights the motivating role of job satisfaction and encourages workers to approach tasks without direct supervision (Aithal & Kumar, 2016).

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. According to Hattangadi (2014), Theory X and Theory Y represent the perceptions managers hold about their employees. It is not about their general performance outside the work place, it affects on their job, while working in the organization

      Delete
  3. Theory Y supposition the opposite view of theory X and it describes the mental and physical inputs expended at the workplace are associated and par with others (Badubi 2017). The employees are in this class wants to assume responsibility and the needs of their organization to be successes. Also, they are in need of achieving the objectives and goals and adjective to cooperate goals. This class of managers and employees helps drive productivity and performance of cooperate and will comfortably motivate. McGregor’s theory remains critical to develop managers to guide the employees for organizational development and to improve the culture.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Many theorists support that McGregor's theory considers the field of management from a new angle, indicating a strong influential value. In contrast to the principles of conventional management mentioned as theory X, the advocate theory Y illuminated a cluster of redefined concepts such as self-fulfilling prophecy and responsibility (Harmer, 2001).

    ReplyDelete
  5. McGregor, the fundamental world of managers, or cosmology, influences managerial practices that influence subordinates' attitudes, work behaviors, and performance. After explaining the fundamental (and pessimistic) assumptions, managers tend to take into account human behavior in the organization. McGregor urges managers to be involved in self-reflection and to consider a set of alternative hypotheses. In the final analysis, McGregor hopes that increased self-awareness may encourage change in attitudes and behaviors among managers. This list first describes McGregor's theory x and y theory, next to the meaning of McGregor's theory, and the last part explains the effect of practice. Fundamental factor (Baldwin, 2013)

    ReplyDelete
  6. According to McGregor's theory, an organizational diversity creates, more precisely, the influence of managers, creating an environment that reflects their beliefs and values ​​about employees. (Cardoso, P. et al.2015)

    ReplyDelete